Playing

I stopped playing bassoon the day of my last performance exam. I went, performed, was told that I should have prepared a longer program, and left knowing I’d receive a higher mark than I deserved. That night, when I cut off the tip of my right ring finger while chopping carrots, some relief was mixed in with the struggle to stay conscious. That little injury meant I couldn’t play for at least a week, which turned into a month, then a year, and then another.

If I had wanted to play, I would have, but in all honestly, the instrument made me feel sick. I could hardly stand listening to a bassoon, let alone touch my own. I had been demoralized by failing to give this learning opportunity all that it deserved. If no one had told me that I might have the chops to go professional, I wouldn’t have felt so guilty for missing the ambition. But with that in mind, how could I not feel like the years of private instruction were wasted on me. My poor teacher had to battle weekly with my seething frustration, and the experience probably left both of us scarred. Fortunately, the shame didn’t prevent all musical development.

In parallel, my math studies had become a strong source of self-loathing. By not living up to some articulated potential, I felt unworthy of being called a math major. Incapacitated by the fact that I did not give my classes and professors all of the attention they were due, hard work became impossible. I am somewhat amazed that I managed to graduate when so much time was lost clamoring over this miserable psychological lump. Add on the accumulation of all I had neglected in student government, never reaching research targets, nor ever writing a satisfactory paper, and it’s no wonder I graduated with a queasy sense of incompetence. Though in retrospect, I see something ironic in my internal state at a time when my accomplishments were being recognized. I still have to remind myself that two honours degrees and a scarlet key should be considered evidence of being able to do stuff.

All this to say, I needed to escape the throngs of overaccomplished peers and academic expectations, and volunteer run organisations apparently provided the right kind of shelter. Having spent most of my life doing work without pay, volunteering wasn’t new, but somehow the attitude of “whatever works” hadn’t sunk in before taking part in these successful structures of good intentions. At twenty five, I was learning to assess what people did as opposed to looking for what they didn’t. Applying the same to myself is an ongoing project, but the theory is in place.

With this new permission to work on my strengths rather than towards externally articulated virtues, Sigismund the third is no longer scary. I don’t have to be a better sight reader, or have faster technique to be a bassoonist. If I want to play, I will, and finally I did, and it sounded good.

Live vs. Recorded Music

I’m listening to the Stars on CBC’s Concert’s on Demand, from a show at Metropolis over a year ago. They are a great band, and I enjoy much of the one album I own In our Bedroom After the War. So why am I not totally rocking out from this streaming experience? Well, cuz live performances are full of little distracting things.

First off, I know how the music can go, so the deviations in vocal lines, and the thinning of the instrumental lines are not adding to the intensity of the experience. Similarly, live performances, even from a pro group, are not as tight as what can be produced in studio. Not every song is going to be a together as we might be used to.

And then there are there are the recording particularities–the performance venue acoustics, the crowd noises and the messy mixing that is so hard to avoid in live performances.

As I sit the library working on homework, this recording of a live show isn’t as enjoyable as the album versions had been. But I bet that had I been at the show, all of these little differences would not have been a problem. Lots of performers know how a live crowd can get into music that would never work if listened to off site. There are genres of music that really work live but only work live. What’s the big difference? I figure it is mostly due to immersion.

Consider your last show and all the effort to help you focus on the art being performed. The lights are turned down, except for the stage, to help you ignore the people around you, the sound is turned up so you can’t avoid the audio, and so that it masks the aural cues of other again. Add to that the information gleaned from watching the music being made, and you’ve got quite a lot to help you keep tuned into what is going on. But that’s not all: when you go to a show you’ve prepared yourself for the experience. You’ve signed up to play along and get into it for considerable amount of time, and for most people, or at least most Canadians, you also have to respect for those sharing the concert experience by staying inline with acceptable concert behaviour. With all of these external and internal reasons to be into the music of a live show, deviations in performance are not nearly so disturbing. In fact, for the most part, they are easily explained by the information that doesn’t make it into the audio archive.

Of course, with a little time, we can adapt to a lot of the weirdness. By Midnight Coward, I’ve been successfully carried away by this compromised copy of the show.

Exertion patterns

As it is crunch time in academia land, I am surrounded by people struggling to meet their ambitions/obligations in the face of the hard deadlines. I have to admit that there are times in the year when being a student isn’t very demanding: flexible hours, freedom to cut corners, and creative opportunities abound. But these are broken up by periods of overdrive, when finding places to nap in the lab or library seems more reasonable than going home or eating. This rollercoaster effort creates difficult demands on our willpower, to say the least. Which makes me wonder: are the people drawn to academia particularly suited for this kind of exertion oscillation, or are they just living with it for the sake of the other benifits?

Come to think of it, how am I to know if this is normal or abnormal career investment? Is school harder than most peoples work?

The answer is probably that it depends on what and who, but either way, here’s to hoping that the work is worth doing.

Reintegrating

As of January, I will once again be a degree persuing student at McGill University. I’ll be continuing to do my data analysis development for music cognition research (continuous ratings and all that) within the remarkably flexible MA in Music Technology. I know, I know, I said I’d had enough of McGill, but this is a chance to develop further the ideas started in my undergrad studies and learn how better to contribute to this messy research area. And I have to admit that the course work that isn’t directly related to music cognition is still very interesting, and in my mind, just as relevant to my academic development.

I wonder when I’ll stop being so surprised by all the stuff people have already done. It really makes me feel like a neophyte which, in terms of grad studies, I am. Don’t get me wrong – I always assume that whatever I find interesting has been interesting to other before me, and thus, the obvious corollaries are probably already articulated. The problem is finding where they were left by other curious parties. It would have save me some time had I known that the discrete integration I’d been using for modeling was just your run of the mill convolution in digital signal processing land. In particular, people would have trusted the process more readily had I used someone else’s terminology…

Considering how much I have learned through the prereq classes, I am keen for more, because it seems that people in music tech think in interesting ways.

Academic communities and me

This summer, I have tested the waters in four different academic communities, looking for a place to call home, at least in terms of research. In each I saw how I might fit in, and they all gave me some hope for the future, which doesn’t help narrow down the choices.

Back in June I attended the Mathematics and Computation in Music conference at Yale. The food was good, the grad students were a blast, and talking about music with a pile of people who like math is always a relief. I did have a moment of panic when Morwaread Farbood presented research very close to my own, relating musical features to listener’s continuous ratings of tension. Still it was nice to meet someone handling similar headaches of analysis. But most of the presentations were pretty far away from my driving curiousities, looking into clever representations of tonality, harmony and scale theory. Important note: participants included composers, theorists, mathematicians, computer scientists, electrical engineers and whatever I might be.

At the end of July, I had my research debut presenting a poster of my Audience Activity Analysis at the meeting of the Society of Music Perception and Cognition at Indiana University in Indianapolis. It was so much fun, really laid back, and I met more people dealing with continuous response data, and awesome grad students, interesting faculty and got a better idea of the spread of work being done across North America. Here the population was even more mixed, with psychologists, neuro-scientists, music therapists, theorists, computer scientists, music educators and a few stray engineers. Presenting was a very validating experience as I finally felt like I had a reason for being there, and could participate as a research rather than just as a student. Also out of discussions, I have taken up the task of creating a continuous response data analysis wiki in the next couple of months, and I hope to make it useful to researchers new to this kind of data.

I flew back to Montreal just in time to catch the Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience workshop being held both at Brams and McGill. This was much more psych and science oriented: in a group of forty, including faculty, I may have been one of three with a B. Mus. This workshop did give me a lot more context on standard practices for getting at the questions of how sound and music works in us, and the neuroimaging data looks like it would be so much fun to work with. In terms of means, this was really cool, but I felt uneasy about how the questions were being asked because they often weren’t from my angle, and that difference felt more important that in the other group academic activities I had take part in. Of course, this was also a more actively educational context, so I’d expect there to be a lot more of telling us how to think, but still, it makes me inclined to hold back on crossing over to psych.

And the last conference, which just ended, was the International Computer Music Conference again here at McGill. In this case I was volunteering as well as attending, so it was a different conference experience, but one that was a lot cheaper than flying across the world. I volunteered a lot to learn more about how to run a conference, getting to hear about what was involved in setting it up, how many people were needed to make things happen, what kinds of information was needed for delegates, and how to include such a range of spaces and activities for interdisciplinary conferences. This conference had a lot of engineers and computer scientists, as well as theory people, performers and composers. While the subjects of much of the research was far from my own, the way in which they investigated and presented felt right and reasonable. Most people had brains I could relate to, and there was a range of social awkwardness that I cherish because of my math days. This context really got me thinking about Music Technology programs, and whether I might be best off putting myself in a context that would give me skills I am actively inclined to acquire. I had so many good conversations with interesting people who both were working on data issues similar to my own and who had lots of recommendations for what I should do next and where I should go.

So my notes books are stuffed with ideas to follow up on and papers to read on interesting things, while my head is reeling from all the exciting possibilities, and above all of that, the pressure to submit this paper to Music Perception is growing by the minute, as that more than anything will convince schools that I am more than just talk. Speaking of which, I should get back to that.

Over and out,
Finn